The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The chart demonstrates how often people in the USA consumed in fast food restaurants in the years 2003 and 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that several period of time, people ate fast food and the top of level approximately 33% once a week in 2006 however every day eating percent was drammatically decreased about 4% and 3% from 2003 to 2013.
We can see that first of all, people of consumption gradually dropped every day in 2003 however number of people considerably increased to 17% sevaral times a week . Clearly , with 32% percent of people ate fast food once a week and thus level of eating standed steadily 30% once or twice a month. However a few times a year figure of people fell down in 2003 and never ate by USA people.
Secondly, the chart explains that in 2006 and 2013 consumption steadily standed approximately 4% but it suddenly rose 20% and growth of rate with 33% once a week . Certainly people ate fast food 25% that in 2013 consumption gradually reached 33%.
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environment problems 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children 78
- The chart below shows the changes that take place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre in 2003 and 2012
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough 61
- Some people believe that overpopulation is the main problem Do you agree or disagree with this statement What are the causes of overpopulation 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
.... Overall, it can be seen that several period of time, people ate fast food and the top of le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of people considerably increased to 17% sevaral times a week . Clearly , with 32...
^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y increased to 17% sevaral times a week . Clearly , with 32% percent of people at...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d to 17% sevaral times a week . Clearly , with 32% percent of people ate fast foo...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ded steadily 30% once or twice a month. However a few times a year figure of people fel...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and growth of rate with 33% once a week . Certainly people ate fast food 25% that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, secondly, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60571428571 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59265858737 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3118184312 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360958255467 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200802861006 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136170421763 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270682487159 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135174558365 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.