The given bar graph illustrates the number of Southland which were earned money from international tourism, dairy products and meat products in 2000 and 2020 as well as future projection 2025.
It can be clearly seen that, there will be earned money from international tourism which was 10 billion pounds in 2025. While, there is the nine billion pounds earned money by international tourism in 2020 but only 8 billion pounds earning from global in 2000. Further, there is highest source of income from dairy products in 2020 which is 10 billion pounds, whereas after five years it will be slightly dropped in 2025 approximately 9.5 billion pounds. But,in 2000, the least of income source from same products which was 7 billion pounds.
Movie further,the maximum earned money to meet product in 2000 (6 billion pounds) however, this product fell in the year 2020. But, lowest money earned from meat products after five years.
overall, it interesting to note that, the higher income from dairy products in 2020 and future projection 2025 while, from meat products lower earning income in various years.
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eat products in 2000 and 2020 as well as future projection 2025. It can be cl...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 and 2020 as well as future projection 2025. It can be clearly seen that, th...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
...ing from global in 2000. Further, there is highest source of income from dairy products in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...25 approximately 9.5 billion pounds. But,in 2000, the least of income source from s...
^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...h was 7 billion pounds. Movie further,the maximum earned money to meet product in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
... this product fell in the year 2020. But, lowest money earned from meat products after f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...from meat products after five years. overall, it interesting to note that, the highe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0989010989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40854955875 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.697374104 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0572111316884 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335743172777 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301483230192 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513510294055 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334481557166 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.