The bar chart gives illustration about three major exports - multinational tourism, dairy and meat productions of Southland in 2000, 2021 and future plans for 2025.
In general, the export of international tourism experienced only an increase and it expected to rise in the future, however the trading of meat products encountered opposite to it. Moreover, the export of dairy products show the fluctuating nature in the given years.
More specifically, the export of international tourism was the highest with 8 billion in 2000 whereas that of dairy and meat products were 7 billion and 6 billion, respectively. At present, in 2021, the export of international has grown nearly 9 billion, whilst the export of dairy products has rocketed to 10 billion. By contrast the export of meat faced a decline with 5.5 billion.
As for future predictions for 2025, the export of international tourism will reach it's peak, but the export of the dairy products will fall relatively lower number than 2021's. The export of meat will move downward again with 5 billion.
- The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15028901734 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91107129899 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.142490525 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136413972274 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723289917733 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691995344033 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11048488293 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792607951667 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.