Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Around the world, individuals are highly concerned about their career growth. In fact, there are different views with regard to working for companies. Some people tend towards the viewpoint that working at the same organisation is better for them whereas others are inclined to believe that work for different organisations is the best choice. I am personally prone to support the opinion of the latter one.
People who are in favour of laboring for one company put forth several arguments. Firstly, the benefits of this are working in a comfortable place and familiar condition for oneself. Secondly, this will not only allow employees to gain thorough knowledge about the application but also rise the chances of promotion.
Despite the reasons mentioned above, it is commonly believed that individuals can be benefited by altering companies. First of all, the people who worked different working environment know various systems about the job and it causes a higher salary and an increase in the value of individual. Consequently, financial stability can be attained an earlier stage. This will enable person to lead successful and confident personal life. Another argument is that working for a different organisations bring about creativity because of exchanging data from strangers.
After analyzing both views, I completely agree that, varying jobs should be preferred by multitude since it can provide a better family and professional life. Thus, it is suggested that public will keep themselves motivated for shifting establishments which can help them to enjoy their lives and fulfill family requirements.
- The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Which opinion do you agree with Discuss both options and give examples 78
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'organisation'?
Suggestion: organisation
...rgument is that working for a different organisations bring about creativity because of excha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, in fact, first of all, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44841269841 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87194961798 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0666900971 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396407062993 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116408405761 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13243299857 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222168190151 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147222321845 0.056905535591 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.