The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000
The bar graph describes the number of Southland which were earned money from international tourism, dairy products and meat products in 2000, 2021 and future plans for 2025.
It can be seen that international tourism had the highest earnings of all the time by this case meat products had twice a less numbers than international tourism. The topmost international tourism profit will be made in 2025 which is approximately 10 billion pounds. While, there is only 9 billion pounds earned in 2021 and only 8 billion pounds profit from global in 2000. Further, in 2000 dairy products made the least source of income which was 7 billion pounds, but by the current time it slightly increased to 10 billion pounds, whereas in 2025 it is expected to have 9.5 billion pounds of income.Moreover maximum gain from meat products in 2000 (6 billion) however, in 2021 it falls to 5.5 billions. But, the lowest money gathered from meat products after four years.
Overall, it is interesting to note that, the higher income from dairy products in 2021 and future projection 2025 while, from meat products lower earning incomein various years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-23 | Farrukh.27 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun numbers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... by this case meat products had twice a less numbers than international tourism. The...
^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ed to have 9.5 billion pounds of income.Moreover maximum gain from meat products in 2000...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ed to have 9.5 billion pounds of income.Moreover maximum gain from meat products in 2000...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96825396825 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62816541267 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1343471443 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0446773462047 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231632432335 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284421263258 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368736969698 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304457527582 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.