The chart below gives the information of cinema attendance by age group between 1984 and 2000.
The graph depicts the proportion of people in four age groups who went to cinema in Great Britain from 1984 to 2000.
Overall, there was a clear increase in the percentages of cinema attendance among four age groups in the given period. While the 15-24 age group was the highest, the 35 and over one showed the opposite.
In 1984, about 18% people aged 15-24 went to the cinema, 17% higher than that of people aged 35 and over. 10% and 4% were the proportions of 7-14 and 25-35 age group respectively. Although the statistics rose and fell over the period of 16 years, the general trend was still upward.
In 2000, after having reached the peak in the previous year, attendance of 15-24 age group fell slightly to 59%, which was the highest among four groups. In contrast, despite having experienced a drastic rise from 1%, the percentage of group above 35 was still the lowest, ending with about 14%. Having followed quite similar patterns, the proportions of people aged 7-14 and 25-25 both ended at 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives the information of cinema attendance by age group between 1984 and 2000. 78
- The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 88
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 94
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
- The chart below gives information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7191011236 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30654754899 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8751898706 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244459523841 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116288614622 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771352212803 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179656341181 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460682819534 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.