The bar chart illustrates of the British people spent their money to donations different type of ages for two years, 1999 between 2010. It is measured in a percentage. Overall, it can be seen that, people spent money for to, charity these charities were given higher percentages in 36-50 ages.
Donations of people were given about the proportion of 17 for two 18-25 ages in 1990. By 2010, given donations declined dramatically the percentage of 7 in these ages. For to 26-30 ages were spent charity the percentage of 30 in 1990 and for 2010 people spent money was about 25%. In 36-50 ages saw high charity percents of 42 in 1990. Subsequently, in 2010 given money for charity declined significantly was around in 35.
Afterwards, percentage of donation for 51-65 ages witnessed slight decrease in 35% for 1990 and these ages saw a bit higher percent of 39% for 2010. In donation of 65 ages experienced the percentages of 33 in 1990. By 2010, these progresses increased significantly than 1990 year.
- As languages such as English Spanish and Mandarin become more widely spoken there is a fear that many minority languages may die out Some countries have taken steps to protect minority languages What is your view of this practice 20
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 89
- Transport preferences amongyoung people from different countries 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86046511628 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75900119879 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7015611624 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.181818181818 5.23603664747 3% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277905324988 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121603786839 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052784935605 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211128624638 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125870461713 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.