The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar graph depicting the proportion of British who donated for charity according to their age groups in two distinct years, 1990 and 2010.
It is conspicuous that people from 36 to 50 years old were the dominant group giving money for charity in the first year. Additionally, older people who are over 50 years old devoted much more donations in 2010 than 1990 whereas the reverse was true for other groups.
In 1990, roughly 17% of British residents aged 18 to 25 gave money to charity and the number of people preferring to assist the disadvantaged surged twofold in the 26 to 35 age group. Strikingly, the highest percent of people who contributed grants belonged to the 36 to 50 - year-olds with over 40%. Nevertheless, the figure of inhabitants donated plunged in people aged 51 to 65 and over 65 years old with 35% for the former and about 32% for the latter.
After 20 years, British people from 51 to 65 who were the most outstanding folk took part in donation with nearly 40%. Thereafter, second in terms of the proportion of philanthropists were people from 36 to 50 and above 65 with the same percent, exactly 35%, followed by a decline over 10% in the number of donors in the ages of 26 to 35. Meanwhile, the percentage of contributors from 18 to 25 reached a nadir with approximately 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-01-23 | Nicole Yu | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | Punm | 56 | view |
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of our increasing use of computers 89
- The monthly price of exported rice from ThaiLand and VietNam from 2012 to 2015 Million dollars per tons 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he bar graph depicting the proportion of British who donated for charity accordin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, nevertheless, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62978723404 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71248668708 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.212336756 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209129684558 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989597537798 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609796174996 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144088136582 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551168880945 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.