Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some
believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In this day and age, modern technology has played an indispensable role in people's lives; however, it has some detrimental effects on the environment. It is argued that by living a green life, humans can deal with environmental degradation while others believed that technology may imitate this problem. From my perspective, I concur with the latter mindset due to several compelling reasons.
On the one hand, it is conspicuous that adopting a simple life without depending too much on cutting-edge technology does a favor for the environment in terms of emitting fewer emissions and saving a myriad of energy. First, should humans use bicycles or public transportations on a daily basis, they will restrict the toxic fumes which are released into the atmosphere. To be more specific, some means of transport such as cars, motorbikes, and planes had been posing a huge threat to the environment by a wide amount of carbon dioxide discharged every day, which can contribute to global warming and climate change. Take the Co-vid 19 situations last year, humans were curtailed going out, facilitating fewer private vehicles on the road resulting ozone layer recovered than ever. Furthermore, cutting down the usage of household devices, and this will maintain human resources. Using some facilities such as television or air conditioning when necessary, results in a decrease in the demand for fossil fuels.
On the other hand, thanks to numerous useful technologies, people can protect the environment in more efficient ways. To begin with, the application of renewable resources into daily life has not only saved energy but also benefits for atmosphere. State-of-the-art technologies create a lot of eco-friendly transports and household devices powered by alternative energy sources without causing greenhouse gas emissions. Besides, some scientists have invented various equipment which is able to address tons of rubbish and dirty water released every hour. Instead of throwing this waste into the ocean, applying waste treatment technologies which are wholly beneficial for the environment. For instance, a modern wastewater treatment machine is placed in every factory in Vietnam which can refine contaminated substances before emitting them into the surroundings.
To sum up, although simpler lives are able to alleviate environmental problems, I think that people might utilize modern technology to deal with this imperative issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | lehonganh1212 | 89 | view |
- The graphs show the employment of men and women in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where revelant 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, i think, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51861702128 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02993473038 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.983520156 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6875 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169496308215 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520717967641 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727712565658 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124042842799 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795997827231 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, i think, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51861702128 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02993473038 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.983520156 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6875 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169496308215 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520717967641 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727712565658 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124042842799 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795997827231 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.