The bar chart illustrates the proportion of British people who donates money to charity by five type of age for the years 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the chart, the figure of the years 1990 was opposite trend for the 2010. The ages from 18 to 25 giving money were lowest in the both of 2 years.
In 1990, the percentage of ages from 18 to 25 had only 17%, nearly doubling that of the years in 2000. The group of 36-35 ages increased significantly and reaching peaked at over 42%. However, there were a graduate decrease in the ages of 51- 65 and over 65 at 35% and 33% ,respectively.
on the other hand, the trend was trust only start at 7% in the ages of 18-25 and then rose significantly until 51-65 ages, reaching peaked at nearly 40% , after that the figure of the people were over 65 years old declined rapidly at 32%
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 73
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 61
- The maps below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now. 73
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 61
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... graduate decrease in the ages of 51- 65 and over 65 at 35% and 33% ,respectively...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es of 51- 65 and over 65 at 35% and 33% ,respectively. on the other hand, the tr...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... over 65 at 35% and 33% ,respectively. on the other hand, the trend was trust onl...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...1-65 ages, reaching peaked at nearly 40% , after that the figure of the people wer...
^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver 65 years old declined rapidly at 32%
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 676.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25157232704 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29823301691 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.459119166 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20577052984 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112257478239 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871023749914 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155276338807 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971106474209 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.