The given bar chart well compares the level of donation among people of different ages in Britain, in the year of 1990 and 2010. It can be clearly seen that people gave money to charity in 1990 had a greater percentage than in 2010.
In details, a group of middle-aged people (36-50) in 1990 took the first place in charitable donation, with approximately 42%, while the youngest group (18-25) in this year also had the least contribution, which took part in only 17% of the total donation. By 2010, both groups underwent a significant fall to 35% and 7%, respectively. The proportion of donators in the 26-35 age range also experienced a decrease, from 31% in 1990 to 24% in 2010.
In contrast, the percentage of people who took part in charity in 51-65 age and over 65 age groups both had a slight growth by decades. For people in the range of 51-65 years old, the donations rose from 35% to nearly 40%, which was the highest record of 2010. Meanwhile, the increasing figure for the over 65s was lower than this, with 32% in 1990, before growing up to 35% in 2010.
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all male and female workers by occupation in the UK in the year 2005 88
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48969072165 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51215030186 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4585841209 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220568328548 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106386622645 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467308201472 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166815050488 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530670098074 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.