Railways and motor vehicles are considered the most popular transportation modes in most of the countries. While some people may prefer governments to pour greater financial resources into railways, I would argue that governments should also extend that support to public roads equally.
However, some opponents undervalue public transports and stick with idea of using private vehicles. Follow their perspectives, a vast majority of commute using vehicles on road, which will put a strain on it. Therefore, the overload in the amount of traffic participants in bottlenecks tends to be continuous stuck. Not only traffic jam, air pollution is also one of the biggest trouble from overusing private vehicles on road. The number of exhaust emissions from gasoline, which cause a costly damage to the surrounding environment, does not have a signal about stopping. Last but not least, road accidents nowadays are one of the common reasons for individual death.
In contrast, train is a fast and high capacity public transport, which is able to carry a huge amount of humans and loads. Therefore, it naturally reduced the pressure on other means of transport. Moreover, its ticket price is in affordable range and one of the most benefit that train can bring is the guarantee of safety for passengers. For what have been written, I believe that railways network can play a key role in transport system in the near future.
In short, while there is no exact solution for these hot trend problems ( traffic jam, green house gas ), I am on the side that railway system is a decisive factor in inhibition of current transport system problem.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 56
- the chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'costly damage'.
Suggestion: costly damage
...st emissions from gasoline, which cause a costly damage to the surrounding environment, does no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct solution for these hot trend problems traffic jam, green house gas , I am on t...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d problems traffic jam, green house gas , I am on the side that railway system is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11567164179 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74523675042 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8058538733 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0581701588056 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0181785443066 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263927661395 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0379885020018 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288549110713 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.