The bar chart compares British humans of 5 one-of-a-kind a long time for the years 1990 and 2010 in phrases of the share of those who committed their cash to charity.
Overall, it's far clean that a percent of British human beings gave extra money to charity in 1990 than they did in 2010. In addition, elder humans donated extra for charity than more youthful counterparts.
About over 15 percentage of humans elderly from 18 to twenty-five years antique in 1990 donated to charity, while round 17 percentage of these in 2010. The percentage of individuals who became 50 years antique and under spent extra money for charity in 1990 than they did in 2010. The British elderly 50 and more youthful in 1999 spent extra cash on charity than the ones in 2010. The percent of human beings among 36 and 50 years of age in 1999 become the very best for the duration of this period, which accounted for above forty percentage. By contrast, the determine for the youngest human beings in 2010 turned into the lowest, at over five percentage.
The percentage of British humans after the age of fifty one years vintage reduced barely their donation to charity among 1999 and 2010. The percent of those who changed into fifty one and above in 1999 declined through below five percentage (35 percentage of the second one oldest organization and approximately 32 percentage of the oldest age institution). The determine for human beings withinside the fifty one-sixty five age organization turned into precisely 35 percentage in 1999, in comparison to over 30 percentage of the sixty five plus age institution. The share for humans among fifty one years antique and above in 1990 turned into decrease than the determine for the ones in 2010
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: nguyenphthao99@gmail.com
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... cash on charity than the ones in 2010. The percent of human beings among 36 and 50...
^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...or above forty percentage. By contrast, the determine for the youngest human beings in 2010 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: fifty-one
...tage of British humans after the age of fifty one years vintage reduced barely their dona...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: fifty-one
.... The percent of those who changed into fifty one and above in 1999 declined through belo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rcentage of the oldest age institution. The determine for human beings withinside t...
^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rcentage of the oldest age institution. The determine for human beings withinside the fifty o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 561, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of the sixty five plus age institution. The share for humans among fifty one years ...
^^^
Line 4, column 588, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: fifty-one
...institution. The share for humans among fifty one years antique and above in 1990 turned ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 656, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...above in 1990 turned into decrease than the determine for the ones in 2010
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56752496988 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407407407407 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4913410176 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220881163316 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107475116985 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364755727724 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151577624344 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241182191962 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.