The chart below illustrates information about different types of addiction. It shows the amount of poisonous substances that are used during the week.
The bar grap represent the data of various types of addiction. There are the 0-2 and 5-7 family dinners per week that are used dangerous substances in the last week.
The proportion of the poisonous substances used by 0-2 family dinners is much higher as compared with those 5-7 days of the week.
Firstly, There are 15% of 0-2 family dinners in a week that are consumed tobacco and just 4% with those who has a 5-7 day dinner with family in a week. Secondly, More than 30% used alcohal with 0-2 days family dinner whereas 15% of those that have 5-7 days of dinner with family in a week. Secondly, More than 30% used alcohal with 0-2 days family dinner whereas 15% of those that have 5-7 days of dinner with family in the week. Thirdly, 21% of 0-2 family dinner consumed Marijuana as compared with Just 8% use by those of having family dinner of 5-7 days.
The dinner with family of 0-2 have 43% friends that are drink continously while those who have a 5-7 family dinner have 29% buddies that are doing the same. Moving ahead, There are 43% of 0-2 family dinners that have friends who
used the marijuana at regular intervals and those who with 5-7 have 18% buddies that consumed marijuana. Lastly, 15% with 0-2 family dinner saying that they can try the drugs in the upcoming future while in the case of with 5-7 family dinners per week, there are just 4% that are hoping that they can used these poisonous substances in the upcoming time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Happy Aujla | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed by 0-2 family dinners is much higher as compared with those 5-7 days of the wee...
^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the week. Firstly, There are 15% of 0-2 family dinners in a week that are...
^^
Line 8, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inner saying that they can try the drugs in the upcoming future while in the case...
^^
Line 8, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pcoming future while in the case of with 5-7 family dinners per week, there are j...
^^
Line 8, column 305, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...e just 4% that are hoping that they can used these poisonous substances in the upcom...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07004023508 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.340909090909 0.547539520022 62% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7804446323 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968119178497 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724597229865 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591833988631 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100055311283 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690356542565 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.