The chart below shoe the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of Japanese tourist market.
The bar chart indicates how the number of tourists travelling changed in Japan over the period 1985 to 1995. While the line graph represented contribution of Australian tourists in Japanese tourist market in the percentage term.
According to the bar chart, there was a significant rise from about 5 millions to 11 millions in the first five years of the period. After that, the trend showed a moderate decline to just over 10 millions in a year. The rest of the period, the number of travellers hold an upward trend and reach its peak of over 15 millions in 1995.
Turning to the line graph, the number of people who came from Australia as a tourist increased from2% to 4% till 1988. There was growth again to over 6% between 1989 and 1993 after a slight decline during 1988 to 1989. At the end of the period, the percentage decrease to 6%.
Overall, the number of travellers from abroad increased in Japan during the period. There was corresponding rise in contribution of Australians.
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1985 and 2005 33
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from Bluesky University in 2006 entiring different employment sectors 65
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what men and women say makes them most happy. 89
- The pie charts show average household expenditure in Hong Kong and Britain in the year 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in Japan over the period 1985 to 1995. While the line graph represented contribution...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72832369942 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63892933029 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7275150389 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.8 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269946786159 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975689360609 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102504366481 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169033977474 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138789501985 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.