The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010.

The charts below illustrate 4 fields of study in which degrees were obtained at the National University over 3 subsequent decades - 1990, 2000 and 2010. Overall, more degrees were awarded to students in Computer Science whilst Law accounted for the lowest numbers of granted degrees.

It is clear from the charts that within the period of 3 decades the number of obtained degrees in Computer Science increased by 15% among other fields of study and made up 45% in 2015. On the contrary, completely another trend can be seen in Business degree as its ratio halved by 2010 and became 15%.

Furthermore, the percentage of degrees granted to medical and law students changed every successive decade by 5%. The figures in Medicine and Law made up 25% and 15% respectively in 1990 as well as 2010 while in 2000 the numbers of these degrees were 5% less as initially were awarded at the National University.

In summary, there was a significant decrease in the number of Business graduates and more students were awarded to Computer Science over this period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e numbers of these degrees were 5% less as initially were awarded at the National ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, well, while, in summary, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9217877095 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59236176221 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.191903226 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288901330693 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141294012214 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142031230598 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175164098684 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135582183092 0.0819641961636 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.