The given bar chart illustrates the information about globe population in India, China, United State of America, and Japan between 1950 to 2000 and it's estimated year till 2050. The data has been given in percentage.
Overall, it is crystal clear that China's population was maximum in 1950 and 2000 as compare to others. However, the population was minimum in Japan and estimated cost will be also lesser in 2050.
Having a quick glance on bar chart, the India was followed the upward trend. The population was 15% in 1950, which was increased by 4% in next year and it's estimated population will be over fifth. Moreover, the China's population was higher than others and also follow the downward trend according to the years. Likewise, it was over quater in first year, afterthat it was slight decreased and reached at 24% and the protection will under fifth in 2050.
Probing ahead, in 1950 USA's population was 10% which was more then from 2000 and 2050. Futhermore, the Japan's population was fewer as comparsion to other nations. It was only in 5% in 1950 which was decreased by 1% in 2000 and it's estimated cost would be in tiny fraction in 2050.
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, will projection till 2050. 67
- Some people think that people who are over 60 years old should not work ans should be made to retire. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that people who are over 60 years old should not work ans should be made to retire. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The tables show the population density in 6 countries and the increasing rate of urban population in 2008. 61
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, will projection till 2050. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... USAs population was 10% which was more then from 2000 and 2050. Futhermore, the Jap...
^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ermore, the Japans population was fewer as comparsion to other nations. It was onl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76616915423 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46738082176 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1880426723 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208006615334 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951623198956 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603113972625 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153409070008 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024336866716 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.