The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years.
The data regarding the ratio of visitors using three separate kinds of accomodation in three distinct years 1988, 1998 and 2008 is depicted by the given pie charts.
Overall, the presentation it is clear that the maximum holidaymakers preferred to stay with family and friends. However, the uncausal feature that cannot be ignored that minimum travellers intrested in camping.
Having a cast fleeting glance, it is cleared that in 1998, the most of the holidaymakers favoured to stay with family and friends to 67% and followed by hostels with 26% and carried by camping with 7%. The proportion of visitors were three-fifth who preferred to stay with family and friends in 1998. In 1998, percentage of travellers who stayed in hostels were more than camping by 17%.
Turing to third pie chart, in 2008, around half holidaymakers were witnessed in hostels. In the same year the proportion of travellers who favoured camping was less than those who intrested to stay with family and friends which was 14% and 38% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-13 | sonia 7022 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-13 | sonia 7022 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-13 | sonia 7022 | 67 | view |
- Social media is becoming popular among all age groups Moreover sharing information on social media websites does have risks Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 56
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69 67
- Some parents think that it is good to have mobile phones for their children Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
- The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04705882353 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76317855184 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3302250175 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141796271174 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654985799295 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063545050071 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954593565151 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632134430587 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04705882353 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76317855184 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3302250175 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141796271174 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654985799295 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063545050071 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954593565151 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632134430587 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.