The chart below show what UK graduates and post graduates students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the destinations of graduates and post graduates academicians of UK in 2008 who had part-time placements after graduation.
Overall, the relatively similar trend was observed among graduates and post graduates after leaving college. In both cases, the majority of the students were seeking further studies while the minority participated the voluntary works.
Among graduates, the majority of the part-time workers did further study, 29665, followed by part-time work, 17735, unemployment, 16235 and voluntary work, 3500 while in case of post graduates, the maximum graduates, just below 30,000, choose further study followed by part-time work by about 25,000. Around 1600 post graduates were unemployed, with minimum participation in voluntary works.
The number of pass-outs in under graduates far outweighed the post graduates in the ratio of 10:1. In addition to that, the difference in students adopting further study and part-time work among graduates were higher in comparison to post graduates, however, other sectors depicted the similar trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | the_prisoner | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | the_prisoner | 73 | view |
- The chart below show what UK graduates and post graduates students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year before and year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summarise 61
- The two pie chart below shows the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81875 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85858766483 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4271016893 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277481183138 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138551631704 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738070753929 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189745830317 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054047815784 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.