The bar graph gives information about support from six developed governments which are the US, Germany, the UK, Japan, Netherlands, and Sweden to developing ones from 2008 to 2010. The units are measured in billions of dollars.
To begin with, the US provided the most aid in all three years, although there was a slight drop in 2009 from 23 to 20 billion dollars. On the other hand, the help from Netherlands and Sweden was always under 10 billion dollars as well there was the same changing pattern.
When it comes to the others, it can be noted that there is also the same model of change between the UK and Japan. Their supports were usually over 10 billion dollars in this period, notwithstanding that the values decreased gently in 2009 as in the US. Furthermore, Germany increased its aid continuously over the years from 10 to about 15 billion dollars.
Overall, even though the US accommodated the highest aid to developing countries, it should be clearly stated that Germany was the only country with consistent upwards.
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 78
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, well, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87570621469 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63769815605 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8265373166 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190011439005 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746798892308 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885286263233 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12336911406 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821579072147 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.