The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011.
Details regarding the quantity of money that five organizations allocated to developing countries during the course of 4 years, commencing in 2008, are depicted in the bar chart.
It is noticeable that the money spending on developing countries from organization 2 substantially surged, while the opposite was true for the figures for organization 4 and 5. Additionally, organization 2 also contributed to the highest amount of money among the 4 surveyed nations.
Starting at nearly 1.3 billion dollars invested to developing countries in 2008, the money organization 2 spent culminated at over 2.5 billion dollars at the end of the period. While the figure for organisation 3 was higher initially, it fluctuated and experienced a plateau of 1.5 billion dollars in 2021.
In terms of the three remained organizations, in 2008, organization 5 invested 1.2 billion dollars in developing countries, compared to approximately half of the figure for organization 4. 2011 witnessed a plummet in the amount of money that organization 4 and 5 spending, at 0.3 and 0.45 billion dollars, respectively. The figure for organization 1 relatively remained unchanged during the surveyed course, at around 0.6 billion dollars.
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 73
- Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 72
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...tions allocated to developing countries during the course of 4 years, commencing in 2008, are depict...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43915343915 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37532134095 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3744855924 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21315814845 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997981397935 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669032879698 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14615332388 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575987414764 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.