The bar chart indicates how much is being spent on fast foods by various income groups in Britain. The line graph, on the other hand, depicts the trends of consumption on three types of fast foods which are hamburgers, fish and chips, and pizza from 1970 to 1990.
According to the bar chart, it can be noticed that high income group spent the greatest amount of money on hamburgers each week compared to other fast foods. The chart shows each person in this income group spent above 40 pence per week on hamburgers while the money spent on fish and chips and pizza were below 20 pence per week. Aside from that, the amount of money spent by average income group on hamburgers, fish and chips and pizza were below 35 pence, 25 pence, and 13 pence each week. It is surprising to notice that average income group favoured fish and chips more than pizza and its expenditure on fish and chips was higher than the high income group. As for the low income group, each person showed the highest spending on fish and chips than on hamburgers and pizza each week. The amount of money spent by this income group on the three types of fast foods were roughly 18 pence, around 15 pence, and 8 pence respectively.
The line graph shows that the fast food which had the highest quantity of consumption in 1970 was fish and chips. It was then followed by hamburgers and pizza. The quantity of consumption of fish and chips in 1970 was above 300 grams. This fast food showed a decline trend in which by 1990, the amount fell to below 250 grams. As for the hamburgers and pizza, both showed an inkling trend in term of consumption in which by 1990, the figures were above 500 grams and below 300 grams respectively.
To sum up, high income group indicates the highest level of expenditure on fast foods while low income group showed the lowest level of expenditure. Besides, people tend to consume fish and chips more in 1970. However, in 1990, people change their preference by consuming hamburgers more instead.
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 59
- the graph and table below show the average monthly temperature and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The pie chart below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 79
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'however', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'as for', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290076335878 0.268076937826 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.10941475827 0.116061578633 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0839694656489 0.0759168565197 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0229007633588 0.0366838410393 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0127226463104 0.0131127313244 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.160305343511 0.155750635184 103% => OK
Participles: 0.027989821883 0.0379272487307 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.22589771605 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0178117048346 0.0210936926555 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00254452926209 0.00175180941692 145% => OK
Determiners: 0.0916030534351 0.0948980150116 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00254452926209 0.00437022459523 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127226463104 0.00967000014798 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2009.0 1161.00487805 173% => OK
No of words: 358.0 196.9 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61173184358 5.90752243213 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 3.73763899035 116% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.254189944134 0.337110787985 75% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.131284916201 0.247514529752 53% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0949720670391 0.171178102325 55% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0642458100559 0.112407865282 57% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22589771605 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388268156425 0.546246751206 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.4195254627 49.3433353143 80% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 8.93414634146 179% => OK
Sentence length: 22.375 23.0094962315 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3292798752 42.9750493124 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5625 135.714022679 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 23.0094962315 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 35.5034916201 47.7609492067 74% => OK
Elegance: 3.29824561404 2.94281807926 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45016352265 0.418131533498 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.214255384411 0.181151798455 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.132710382044 0.0850326197045 156% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.608744838085 0.706616315825 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140377927829 0.157042692854 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217619724169 0.228904883108 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122739751151 0.108899403657 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.381658225008 0.367819155151 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0739089164695 0.0812612215331 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345558654911 0.316326947829 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853213517845 0.0921553760075 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.08536585366 220% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 3.02926829268 297% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 7.1512195122 224% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.