The bar graph gives information about people who paid money every week for fast foods in Britain in 1990 while the line graph illustrates the number of fast foods was consumed by per person in 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990.
As can be seen from the bar chart, majority of hamburger were chosen by high income Britain whereas there was least pizza which consumed in different kind of income level. Fish and chip and hamburger have increased during the period time but the opposite was true for pizza.
At the glance, in the bar chart, there was decreased trend at hamburgers from high salary to low income and peaked at 45 pence per person in high income which nearly triple as much as low income. Following by approximately 35 pence per person spending money bought it. For fish and chip of fast foods were highest in people having a medium salary at 25 and this figure was fluctuated from over 15 to 25 between high income and low income. However, the minority of people ate pizza from over 5 in low income to roughly 20 in high income.
Initially 1970, consumption of hamburger and fish & chip accounted for nearly 100 grams to peaked at 300 grams and 500 grams respectively in 1990. But the trend was not true in pizza, 300 grams was eaten in 1970 but the trend dropped gradually from roughly 300 grams in 1975 to 200 grams over 15 years later.
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 67
- The diagram describes the production of canned fruit. 61
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...en by high income Britain whereas there was least pizza which consumed in different kind ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pizza. At the glance, in the bar chart, there was decreased trend at hamburgers ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5368852459 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21239550658 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4449760735 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149983598183 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637637024201 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763762836613 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105326916121 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954911766904 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.