The diagrams give information about the transformation of school site from 2004 to 2024.
As can be seen from the diagrams, the layout of school will not change much in the next twenty years; however, there will be enlarged of school building, leading to the rise of students.
In 2004, there were just 600 students, attending this school, the school building was separated by the path that connected from the main entrance to the sports field. At 2024, it is estimated that the number of student would increased at 1000 pupils thanks to the construction of new building. Furthermore, the two original building will join together and the erection of short path that link the building only.
Nevertheless, the initial sports center in 2004 will make way for the appearance of school building 3 and car park 2 that is predicted opposite the mushrooming of small sports field. The new road will also be built from the main entrance to the car park 2, the car park 1 and main entrance will stay intact.
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think that this is a positive or negative development? 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 67
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior. 73
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...imated that the number of student would increased at 1000 pupils thanks to the constructi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7816091954 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57614902462 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2874999535 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214473897819 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110985161128 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10632019247 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161027776885 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103763851799 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.