The chart and graph illustrates expenditure on fast food in Britain. Different income groups on horizontal axis is shown in relation to expenditure-P(pence per person per week) on vertical axis.
According to the chart consumption of three kinds of fast food over three decades. it is clearly seen that high income people spend more money in fast food then two other income groups; pizza was the only fast food showed an enormous decreased.
Spending more than twice as much on hamburgers (43 pence per person per week) than on fish and chips or pizza (both under 20 pence). Average income earners also favored hamburgers, spending 33 pence per person per week, followed by fish and chips at 24 pence, then pizza at 11 pence. Low income earners appear to spend less than other income groups on fast foods, though fish and chips remains their most popular fast food, followed by hamburgers and then pizza.
Conversely, From the graph we can see that in 1970, fish and chips were twice as popular as burgers, pizza being at that time the least popular fast food. The consumption of hamburgers and pizza has risen steadily over the 20 year period to 1990 while the consumption of fish and chips has been in decline over that same period with a slight increase in popularity since 1985.
In conclusion, it is clear to see from the two graphs that the popularity of hamburgers increases greatly in general over the period, and seems to be most popular in particular with higher income people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart and graph illustrates expenditure on fas...
^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... kinds of fast food over three decades. it is clearly seen that high income people...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...; pizza was the only fast food showed an enormous decreased. Spending more than ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81322957198 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46695061913 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517509727626 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9369132616 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.7 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185952014114 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965671114141 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066364672717 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115984571027 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735711213176 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.