The chart below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph compares the production waste by three different companies from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it saw a significant change in three companies by the time. company A and B cut down the waste output while the company C had a risen considerably.
In the year 2000, company A had the highest production of waste with 12 tonnes. Similarly, company B and C stared with nearly 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste material respectively at the same time. Following 5 years later, the amount of waste production in company B and C slight increased around 2 tonnes. By contract, the figure for company A declined minimally 1 tonne.
In next 10 years, the trend was changed in three companies. In companies A and B, the amount of waste output enormous decreased roughly 4 tonnes while company C increased continuously close to 10 tonnes of waste production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- The pie charts show the result of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time students and part-time students about its service. 73
- The graph below shows US consumers'average annual expenditures on cell phone and residental phone services between 2000 and 2011. 56
- The line graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2000 56
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
- The diagram show the life cycle of a honey bee 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Company
... change in three companies by the time. company A and B cut down the waste output while...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87120028706 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6449198255 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2222222222 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271114679789 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123807113672 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366245127591 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180804446273 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250104579234 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.