With more and more people communicating via computers and smart phones. There is a real danger that we are losing the ability to communicate with others face to face. Do you agree or disagree.
The number of people using social media are increased sharply. To thus, it effects in the ability to communicate face to face with people. In my opinion, I completely agree with that point of view.
Social media apps, include Facebook, are becoming a common trendy technology. Most costumers choose it because they do not pay money to use. Moreover, user can connect with strangers or people, who live in different country. In some develop country, workers do not go to company, they can work at home by using computer. The Time News reported more than billion people use Facebook day by day.
Unfortunately, besides the benefit of testing via computers and smart phones, there are many drawbacks of communication on sites. Some people abuse chatting on the internet and the consequence that they feel panic and lose how to communicate face to face. It difficult for them to make a conversation, explain the problem or show their emotion.Terribly, some kid can not control action or their mind and maybe, he wants to kill himself. The VOA news said a boy 17 in Arizona kill himself after a couple of hours playing in social media.
To include, communication by using social media apps is one of the good way to make a conversation. Human being is for meeting and talking face to face with each others not testing ih sites. Knowing how to use effective it is a key to prevent losing the communicative ability.
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 56
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development ? 61
- The table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 61
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 61
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time .Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages ? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The number of people using social media ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pletely agree with that point of view. Social media apps, include Facebook, are...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...puter. The Time News reported more than billion people use Facebook day by day. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illion people use Facebook day by day. Unfortunately, besides the benefit of te...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Terribly
...plain the problem or show their emotion.Terribly, some kid can not control action or the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uple of hours playing in social media. To include, communication by using socia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7868852459 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77001887515 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627049180328 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8814219592 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317798941953 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984870900003 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995627701006 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193721868862 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784708075902 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.