The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the yearly rental and sales of three different formats: VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray of films from a single shop from 2002 to 2011. All data is measured in numbers.
Looking more closely at the graph, it is obvious from the data that the rental and sales of VHS are continuously falling, In contrast, DVD and Blu-ray sales are continuously rising but DVD sales are started to going down after 2007 and there are no sales of Blu-rays before 2007.
On the one hand, at beginning of the 2002, the number of rentals is nearly 180,000 and it is continuously dropping. At the end of 2011, the number became 50,000. VHS sales are also falling. at the starting of 2002, the number of sales of VHS is 80,000 and in 2006 it's became nearly zero.
On the other hand, The sales of DVDs are climbing up to 2007 and the number of sales in 2007 is more than 200,000. These sales are at peak. After 2007, the sales of it is started to fall and at the and of 2011 it became approximately 180,000. Blu-rays sales are started after 2007 and it is slightly increasing and the number of sales after 2007 was almost 15,000.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...ame 50,000. VHS sales are also falling. at the starting of 2002, the number of sal...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39903846154 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28129432761 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451923076923 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.1729857843 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1818181818 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169257284659 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080104336453 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473178094473 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124705496407 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380046989936 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.