The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in

The line graph represents the average price of each month plans for four different mobile brands in a specific country between January and September 2022.
Overall, it can be clearly seen from the graph that the average cost for Domo, Lex, Alpha surged significantly during the months shown. By contrast Sim TX plunged relatively. In addition, the monthly price of Alpha brands was the cheapest at the beginning; however, it went up dramatically and became the most expensive brand.
In January, every customer had to pay 15 euros to be able to use Domo’s service, the highest fee. This price was 3 times higher than that of Alpha. Over the next 8 month, here was a relative stability in the price of Alpha company before a jump to 25 euros in in the last month, which made alpha the most expensive category. On the contrary, after having to pay the highest price most of the months mentioned, Domo’s users seen a slight plunge to about 23 euros by September which stood the second after alpha.
Starting at 12 euros in Jan, Lex was the second most expensive company in comparison with the other three. During the next 8 months, there was an upward trend to about 18 euros in September. Similarly, the number of Sim TX users rose and peaked at 14 euros in Jun. After that it reduced by just under the first point about 8 euros in the last month.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...Alpha company before a jump to 25 euros in in the last month, which made alpha the mo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, similarly, so, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59917355372 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35964886444 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8368177826 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180425616186 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669142697447 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817279670637 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140121473516 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956586198029 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.