The line graph delineates data from a 2008 report regarding energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with predictions until 2030.
Overall, fossil fuel usage has experienced an increase since 1980 with estimations of even more consumption of these. By contrast, cleaner energy sources have witnessed lower figures of consumption with expectations of similar trends.
Particularly, the consumption of the fossil fuels rose steadily since 1980, with the petrol and oil starting at 35 quadrillion units, fluctuating until 2000, and then grew gradually with a projection of over 45 quadrillion units by 2030. Coal followed a similar pattern, starting from 15 quadrillion units and it is anticipated to reach at around 30 by 2030. Natural gas consumption underwent fluctuations and it is envisaged to level off at about 24 quadrillion units by 2015.
Regarding cleaner fuels, they all began beneath 5 quadrillion units. However, nuclear energy went up slightly with a forecast of reaching just under 10 quadrillion units by 2030. Solar and wind energy fluctuated negligibly and are likely to end at nearly over 5 in 2030, whereas hydropower saw a downward trend and will remain relatively stable until 2030.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34554973822 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9611206527 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638743455497 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.343136195 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372119584786 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152141628649 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150043108908 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26202063485 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166850352717 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.