The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city centre from 2003 to 2012.
The stipulated line graph depicts the detail pertaining that how much crime incidents were happened in New Port city centre between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, it can be inferred that burglary crime rate showed a downward trend. Whereas, car theft and robbery represented a constant trend between given time period.
At the fleeting glance, in 2003, the burglary crime rate was less than 3500 incidents while it was increased and reached at its peak point which was accounted as around 4000 cases in 2004. After this year, it was declined continuously between 2004 and 2009 which was comprised at 1500 incidents. It was remain constant after four years. Moreover, robbery cases was 500 in 2003 and it showed fluctuation in given time period. However, in 2012, it was around 1000 cases respectively.
Moving further, approximately 3000 incidents were accounted by car thieves in 2003 and it was constant from 2003 to 2005. After 2005, it was decreased and represented little fluctuation upto 2009. Whilst, in 2012, it reached at its same point where it started from around 3000 cases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een 2004 and 2009 which was comprised at 1500 incidents. It was remain constant a...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...as comprised at 1500 incidents. It was remain constant after four years. Moreover, ro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05586592179 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53457721236 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9532784989 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149461905372 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612078094295 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683907224833 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112936497904 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779057999327 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.