The provided line graph gives information about the variations in the number related to three types of crime which happened in Newport city center between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, while both figures of car theft and robbery did not change significantly in the mentioned time, that of burglary had a downward trend.
At first, in 2005, the number of occurred burglaries stood at the vicinity of 3500 which was followed by an increase to roughly 4000 in 2004 which was the maximum reported number. Then, it decreased by 2500 over the next 4 years and hit the bottom at approximately 1000.Next, it was a small boom over the next year and remained stable in the following 3 years.
Moreover, the number of crime related to the car theft remained static from 2003 to 2012.As for the number of committed robberies, it was the least over a period of 9 years and it had a period of steadiness from 2003 to 2012.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Next
...nd hit the bottom at approximately 1000.Next, it was a small boom over the next year...
^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...theft remained static from 2003 to 2012.As for the number of committed robberies, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68322981366 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53516604131 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.5058484112 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.8 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14923030708 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815126375848 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879312240431 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101890796981 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871121593135 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.