The graph illustrates the trends of crime which happened in three various areas of Newport city centre from 2003 to 2012.
Overall, the number of burglary reduced enormously year by year while the quantity of car thefts and roberries had seen minimal changes.
The number of burglary crime was 3500 in 2003 and it increased a little bit in 2004 to around 4000. However, it changed and decreased to almost 1000 from 2005 to 2008. After that the number of burglary did not see noticeably trends and remained steady.
The crime called car thefting was almost 3000 in 2003 and it had not changed till 2005. Then the number of that crime decreased gradually to 2000 in 2006. Neverthelees, after that year the quantity of car thefting began growing sharply and it reached 3000 again in 2012. In contrast, to car thefting and burglary the number of robbery had not seen dramatical changes. It was almost 530 in 2003 and the numbers were a little less than 1000 in 2005. Then it began falling till 2008. After that the quantity of that crime stayed constand enormously.
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages to this development 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 80
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ime was 3500 in 2003 and it increased a little bit in 2004 to around 4000. However, it cha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 482, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 2005. Then it began falling till 2008. After that the quantity of that crime stayed...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Then it began falling till 2008. After that the quantity of that crime stayed c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75806451613 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33202604477 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47311827957 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3018110917 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.75 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155145268478 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624754167068 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766388112824 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116865009314 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103241548673 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.