The line graph below demonstrates the difference that took place in three various regions of corruption in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
In general, the difference between the changes in the three various directions of crime is quite significant and these are burglary, car theft and robbery(theft from the person).
Between 2003 and 2005, the number of burglary increased from 3000 to 4000. And this number dramatic fell in 2008(1000-1500). However, it grew by 300 accidents and remained stable till 2012. Moving ahead, the car theft was steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004. Then, it was fluctuation level in 2005-2009 and reached about 2250 in 2010. And it was increased to 2700 in 2012 as compared, robbery reached its peak point in 2005, however which was 900 cases and decreased back to 500 incidences in same intial year of level in 2012.
Overall, the rate of burglary declined sharply. The level of robbery remained constant in all year. Moreover, car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 67
- The Chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003 2012
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 73
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below demonstrates the difference that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58627729208 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8836663176 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6363636364 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242113720404 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080685796109 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104532546244 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167423211748 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12408815388 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.