The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the results of how often people buy and drink a various types of coffee in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.

In general, we can see three main features in last 4 weeks (bought fresh coffee, bought instant coffee and went to a cafe for coffee or tea).

The largest percentage that the people went to a cafe for coffee in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart is 60-65%, Brisbane and Adelaide have a nearly amount, 34,2% and 34,4%. Bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks shows the least percent of all cities. It is 34-45% in Sydney, Melbourne and about between 30% and 40% in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart. The highest percentage for bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks is 54% in Hobart and other cities' percent demonstrates about 45-53%.

The overall figures show that the changes among five cities are various. But bought instant coffee and went to a cafe for coffee or tea's changes are not different.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'type'?
Suggestion: type
...ow often people buy and drink a various types of coffee in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisban...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
...t is 60-65%, Brisbane and Adelaide have a nearly amount, 34,2% and 34,4%. Bought fresh coffee i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78527607362 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35427799199 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2999180028 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189100797797 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922732450053 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426654397381 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132522462709 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315324043795 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.