The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The bar charts illustrate the percentage of different types of power manufactured in France over a decade from 1995 and 2005.
Overall, there were considerable down ward trend for the amount of petrol production while this figure for the others showed a slight improve over the period. Another interesting point is that the amount of fossil fuel made up the majority proportion of the total energy produced.
Looking at details, in 1995 the quantity of gas, coal and petrol are manufactured at the same level, about a third of total energy production in France. This figures for petrol fell down dramatically to 19, 55% meanwhile, both gas and coal production experienced a marginal improvement, increasing by 1% each.
On the other hand, nuclear and other power just made up a small proportion, at 6.4% and 4.9% in turn. However, this figures doubled remarkably to 9.1% for other power compared to 10.1% of nuclear power.
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 82
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one twon who rode bicycles in 2011 56
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 62
- Maintaining public library is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02597402597 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73493049829 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2677406531 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167250636395 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742667509735 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825886035139 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109176365945 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922705057098 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.