The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare the percentages of different types of energy sources in France in two years 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that the percentages of gas and coal increased over the period shown, but the opposite was true for the figure for the Petro. In addition, the percentage for nuclear and other slightly increased.
In 1995, the percentage of gas, coal, and Petro is almost similar, at around 29 percentage. At the same time, the figure for Nuclear was slower at 6.4%. Meanwhile, the figure for others is only 4.9%.
In 2005, the percentage of Petro rapidly decreased by 10% to nearly 20%, while the figure for Coal and Gas slightly increased, at 30.93% and 30.31% respectively. At the same, there was a rapid increase in the figure for Nuclear, at 10.10%. Similarly, Other energy production experienced a rapid rise, at nearly 10 percent.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 61
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 78
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91095890411 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6176662829 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.300124156 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6666666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108030504404 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057822552446 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104297499658 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104990969995 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136035962893 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.