The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart illustrates what proportion of females and males in Australia held distinctive post-school degrees in 1999.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, there are two different groups based on each qualification in which men or women were more interested. First group includes skilled vocational diploma, postgraduate diploma, and master’s degree. Far more males held skilled vocational diploma than females, around 90% in comparison with 10%. While nearly 60% of males were holder of master’s degree, (though 40% of females), the percentage was a bit more in postgraduate diploma by 70% versus 30% of females.
Turning to second group which consists of undergraduate diploma and bachelor’s degree. Females were far more interested than males in both degrees, with approximately 55% and more than 70%, respectively. By contrast, the proportions of men in these qualifications were 45% and 30% in a row.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that, whereas undergraduate and bachelor’s degrees were more popular among females, men were more interested in postgraduate and master’s degrees. Meanwhile, far more men, seemingly disproportionately, than women were holder of job-related diploma in 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | alpha2006sh | view | |
| 2023-10-12 | alpha2006sh | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | tranminh | view | |
| 2021-04-20 | sattar_iust | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-26 | 81206Ecema | 67 | view |
- City population has been growing rapidly To cope with this problem should we rely on city planners or new policies 88
- In education is to learn life values and ethics as important to learn practical skills for future development 77
- The first chart bellow shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 67
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 88
- National happiness index has better performance than economic increase in a nation s development Do you agree and how to measure national happiness 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60752688172 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25421629438 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8708077175 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128652864151 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658235351707 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720545452597 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107649834658 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713650227317 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60752688172 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25421629438 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8708077175 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128652864151 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658235351707 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720545452597 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107649834658 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713650227317 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.