The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.
The tabular chart demonstrates the data of those Male and female who were illiterate in the given different six regions in a particular year 2000. And the data is calibrated in percentage.
It is evident that the literacy rate was wrost in South Asia,because there was the highest proportion of illiteracy. And the male's illustration rate was 30% which was 22% less than the female's illiteracy.And this trend was followed by the Arab States where the figure was slight less than the South Asia. With regards to developed countries, by having less than 1% of both male and female, this area lied on the least position.
Moving further, in terms of Latin America, an equal proportion was recorded in both gender which was 10%. In comparison to male ,female illiteracy rate was double in East Asia which was 20%. And in case of Subsaharan American ,the males, who were not able to read and write, was 3o% which were 10% lower than the female proportion.
Overall, it is clear that amongest all continents, female's illiteracy rate was higher in comparison to male.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | dan1sland | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | parth patel officiall | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | PRM12 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | aremontika | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | aremontika | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ta is calibrated in percentage. It is evident that the literacy rate was wrost...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , because
...he literacy rate was wrost in South Asia,because there was the highest proportion of ill...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'males'' or 'male's', 'malis's'?
Suggestion: males'; male's; malis's
...ghest proportion of illiteracy. And the males illustration rate was 30% which was 22%...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'females'' or 'female's'?
Suggestion: females'; female's
...ate was 30% which was 22% less than the females illiteracy.And this trend was followed ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...as 22% less than the females illiteracy.And this trend was followed by the Arab Sta...
^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an equal proportion was recorded in both gender which was 10%. In comparison to m...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...der which was 10%. In comparison to male ,female illiteracy rate was double in Eas...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 20%. And in case of Subsaharan American ,the males, who were not able to read and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89010989011 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65575091474 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.530731682 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996306455546 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490832806729 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523557514423 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793450038257 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430188916108 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.