The chart illustrates how much money the people in France and UK spent on 5 different categories, namely Cars, Computers, Books, Perfume and Cameras in 2010.
Overall, cars were recorded to be the top sellers in both countries while the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. It is also noticeable that the significant difference between two countries was on the data for books and cameras.
About more than 400,000 pounds were spent on books in the UK, compared to only 300,000 pounds in the figure for France. This dramatic gap is also evident in the spending on cameras. The amount of cash used to purchase cameras in the UK was 350,000 pounds, far exceeding the 150,000 pounds spent in France.
On the other hand, there were only small differences between the two countries in the categories of cars, computers, and perfume. The amount of money used to purchase cars in the UK was about more than 450,000 pounds, and the figure for France was lower by 50,000 pounds, at 400,000 pounds. Similarly, spending on computers in France was slightly higher than in the UK, with amounts reaching 370,000 pounds and 350,000 pounds, respectively. While 200,000 pounds were spent on the perfume by the French, there was a shy of 150,000 pounds used to buy it in the UK, which was the least spending in goods compared to others.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7731092437 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44235858505 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441176470588 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0462166254 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0661392037103 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369520582147 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432851209471 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552661626723 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037503591734 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.