The chart below shows the global sales of different types of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The given chart depicts the information about many types of digital games of global sales between 2000 and 2006.
From an overall prospective, it is clear that there are four types of games. Thus handheld games were maximum in every year and online games did not sale in 2000. While, the data is calibrated in billion dollars.
To begin with, the mobile phone games. In First two years, the mobile games were not sale. In 2002, that was starting at 1 billion sale and it increased year to year, in 2006 (7 billion ) people bought mobile games. Whereas, online games were started in 2001 with 0.5 billion sales. It also increased from 2001 and 2006 and sales 9 billion of online games.
Furthermore, near 6 billion saled of console games in 2000 and that was decreased with 1 billion in 2001 and 2002. After 2002, this was stable upto 2004. In next two years, this declined and only 3 billion were sales in 2006. However, handheld games were bought 11 billion by masses in 2000 and that was inclined from 2000 to 2006. In 2006, nearly 18 billion sales were of handheld games respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | hoangminh2409 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | ninjam18118 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries but it does not solve poverty So rich countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Write a report for University lecturer describing the information shown below
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married in their thirties rather than when they are younger Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 73
- There aren t many houses to accommodate people so it has several social consequences Only the government can solve this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ear that there are four types of games. Thus handheld games were maximum in every ye...
^^^^
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and online games did not sale in 2000. While, the data is calibrated in billion doll...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... 2000. While, the data is calibrated in billion dollars. To begin with, the mobile ph...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased year to year, in 2006 7 billion people bought mobile games. Whereas, onl...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 7 billion people bought mobile games. Whereas, online games were started in 2001 with...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, so, thus, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60824742268 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18870131218 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9936689478 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.8571428571 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8571428571 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319986003163 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128369302487 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11330467101 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252300635309 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117890109917 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.