The bar chart gives information about how many top five mobile phone brands, namely, Samsung, Apple, Nokia, LG, and ZTE were sold around the world from 2009 to 2013. Units are measured in millions.
It is clear that the most Nokia brand’s phones were sold. By contrast, ZTE mobile phones were sold far the lowest figures.
The sailing of Samsung brand’s phones increased steadily from approximately 240 million to near 450 million between 2009 and 2013.Addionally, there were slight decline in the amount of Nokia mobile phones’ selling from 2009 to 2011. After that, it decreased dramatically from around 420 million to about 240 million in the next two years.
There were marked growth in the amount of the Apple brand’s phones selling between 2009 and 2011. Then, it increased moderately from around 90 million to near 150 million until 2013. From 2009 to 2013 saw a gradual drop in the quantity of LG mobile phones’ selling. Sales of the ZTE brand’s mobile phones rose minimally from about 50 million to approximately 70 million during the 4 year.
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 84
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 67
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Addionally
... near 450 million between 2009 and 2013.Addionally, there were slight decline in the amoun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oximately 70 million during the 4 year.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00561797753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50698431029 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9579306265 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305851743231 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129988300457 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885635292295 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197573098919 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486326245691 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.