The graph compares the information regarding the percentage of people who took preserved food in a decade between 2003 and 2013, in the USA . Data is calibrated in the proportion.
Overall, taking junk food was significant activity in once a week and once or twice a moth; however, on a daily base people took least amount of food in the given period.
In the regarding of 2006, the fast food was the highest popular among almost three frequencies namely, several a week, once a week and a few times a year with 20%,33% and 15% respectively which as approximately 5% more as opposed to other years in the same frequency.As contrast, the percentage of people had experienced higher who consumed readily food in once or twice a month in both years 2003 and 2013 which was comprised a third whereas, only 25% people ate food in 2006.
Further scrutinizing the graph, only 5% people were used to take fast food in every day in a decade. As well as fast food was not taken by never almost same proportion. From 2003 to 2013, almost same ratio of public shared similar interest in junk food in a few times a year at 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph compares the information regarding the percentage of people who t...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage of people who took preserved food in a decade between 2003 and 2013, ...
^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...decade between 2003 and 2013, in the USA . Data is calibrated in the proportion. ...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'took the least'.
Suggestion: took the least
...a moth; however, on a daily base people took least amount of food in the given period. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the highest popular among almost three frequencies namely, several a week, once...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a year with 20%,33% and 15% respectively which as approximately 5% more as oppose...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ctively which as approximately 5% more as opposed to other years in the same freq...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ed to other years in the same frequency.As contrast, the percentage of people had...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me frequency.As contrast, the percentage of people had experienced higher who con...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...s, only 25% people ate food in 2006. Further scrutinizing the graph, only 5% people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...y 5% people were used to take fast food in every day in a decade. As well as fast food was n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shared similar interest in junk food in a few times a year at 15%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56930693069 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58324484374 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.462425293 43.030603864 319% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271435798746 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123541632497 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757789621037 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171029618527 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535700835324 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.