The pie charts depicts the information about journal articles which was read by university students per week. It contained the categories of pupils was all students, PHD students and junior lectures in Australia.
In the regard 1 to 5 articles , journal article was most popular with 67%, in all students; however it gained least popularity in junior lectures it was only 1%, and only 5% was preferred by Phd students. In contrast, only 12 % all students took interest to read 12 + articles while, phd pupils was more interested to read 12+ articles it accounted for 80% which more then 3 times fold rise experienced as compared to the junior lectures, it observed 24%
. As regards 6 to 11 articles, 75% was read by junior lectures, it was 3 fold rise as compared to the all students (21%). Phd students showed least preference in these articles, was 15% in the Australia.
In conclusion, journal articles gained different popularity in various students but 1 to 5 articles was unable to take interest of junior lectures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ategories of pupils was all students PHD students and junior lectures in Australi...
^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stralia In the regard 1 to 5 articles journal article was most popular with 67...
^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...journal article was most popular with 67 in all students however it gained least ...
^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'gained the least'.
Suggestion: gained the least
...lar with 67 in all students however it gained least popularity in junior lectures it was on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n junior lectures it was only 1 and only 5 was preferred by Phd students In cont...
^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was only 1 and only 5 was preferred by Phd students In contrast only 12 all st...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red by Phd students In contrast only 12 all students took interest to read 12 a...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 all students took interest to read 12 articles while phd pupils was more inte...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 12 articles while phd pupils was more interested to read 12 articles it accoun...
^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...articles it accounted for 80 which more then 3 times fold rise experienced as compar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enced as compared to the junior lectures it observed 24 As regards 6 to 11 a...
^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e junior lectures it observed 24 As regards 6 to 11 articles 75 was read by ...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showed the least'.
Suggestion: showed the least
...red to the all students 21 Phd students showed least preference in these articles was 15 in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75722543353 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72342069489 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450867052023 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 173.0 22.4926829268 769% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 823.0 112.824112599 729% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 173.0 22.9334400587 754% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 57.0 5.23603664747 1089% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410934019792 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.410934019792 0.103423049105 397% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315898539761 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113001721497 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 87.5 13.2329268293 661% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -87.2 61.2550243902 -142% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.4 10.3012195122 664% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.96 8.06136585366 186% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.2 10.9970731707 647% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 88.0 11.0658536585 795% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.