the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

By taking a brief look at the chart we can see that very few percent of people in the US eat fast food every day and very few percent of people never ate fast food at all, a lot more people eat fast food several times a week and a few times a year. Finally, the highest frequency of people eating at fast food restaurants among the US citizens is once a week and once or twice a month averaging at about 30 percent.
We also can see that the graph is pretty symmetrical, about 5 percent of people eat fast food everyday and similarly about four to five percent never ate fast food. Similar symmetry is with several times a week and a few times a year frequencies and with once a week and once or twice a month Frequencies We can see that the amount of people who eat at fast food everyday declined from 2003 and stayed the same throughout 2006 and 2013. Same behaviour follows the part of the graph which represents people who never ate at a fast food restaurant. Amount of people who eat fast food once or twice a month in 2003 was at about 30 percent, then dropped to about 25% in 2006 and then rose to about 33-34%

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...once or twice a month averaging at about 30 percent. We also can see that the gr...
^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...about 5 percent of people eat fast food everyday and similarly about four to five percen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e amount of people who eat at fast food everyday declined from 2003 and stayed the same ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, look, similarly, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.16589861751 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19895356972 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410138248848 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1683975994 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1666666667 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167006474436 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107858816751 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320199231634 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150524456383 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00918833381307 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.5 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.