The supplied table provides information about conjectured expenditures for three environmental projects on forestry over the next five years in different regions. Meanwhile, represents the distribution of the projected costing for the first year.
According to the table, the highest amount of money will be spent on improving woodlands in Southeast Asia. It is estimated to be 30 million American dollars initially, and grow to 50 million dollars in the year. By contrast, the another prediction is that the expenditure on West Africa will decrease from 10.5 million dollars to 3.5 million dollars. In the first year, it is expected that the spending on project in Central America will account for 20 million, declining to only 5 million from the third to fifth years.
Considering the pie chart, exactly half of expenditures will be invested in salaries during the first year. Moreover, nearly a third of costs is a conjectured to be allocated in set-up sphere. The same amount of money will be put up in both office expenses and trainings, which will be come to precisely a tenth.
Overall, it is apparent that projected expenditures for West Africa and Central America will decrease over the 5-year period, whereas expenses for Southeastern area of Asia will rise. In addition, the greatest part of spendings will be invested in wages, while smaller percentages will be paid for office costs, set-up expenses and the training programmes.
- The chart below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time in the year 1982 79
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Air pollutants in UK 67
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18376068376 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84782489893 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.852463541 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.272727273 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311128544082 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142705966917 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130555908369 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227194167943 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156368629445 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.