The information about how often people in the USA ate in junk food hotels from 2003 to 2013 is depicted by the rendered bar chart. The data has been calibrated in the percentage of people.
To begin with, in 2003, 4% of people ate fast food in hotels on a daily basis. However, the percentage of people who were eating frozen food at hotels every day was 3%, from 2006 to 2013. The proportion of individuals who were going to eat junk food at restaurants several times a week in 2003 was nearly 17%. Although there had been a drastic increase seen in 2006, it was 20%, but the figure was similar in 2013 and 2003. The percentage of the population who were going to eating house once a week was 31%. 33% and 27% of people were eating fast food at hotels one time in a week in the year of 2006 and 2013 respectively.
Moving towards, from 2003 to 2013, a drastic fluctuation was noticed in the proportion of the population of the USA who ate packaged food at eating house one or two times in a month, it accounted for 33% in 2013. In 2003, 13% of people were eating at the fast-food hotel a few times a year. Moreover, there was the same number of people between 2006 and 2013, it comprised to 15%. In addition, only 5% or below 5% of people were never going to the fast-food house from 2003 to 2013.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that fewer people in the USA who ate junk food at eating house throughout the span.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 58
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 61
- IELTS 6 Test 2 Writing Task 2 Academic Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both of these views and gi 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 294.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29591836735 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38751525047 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431972789116 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.01159885 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288938905202 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134875686824 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822770884283 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207699140114 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495698694541 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.