A glance at the provided bar chart illustrates the information about the proportion of citizens in the USA who ate at fast food restaurants by six different frequencies from 2003 to 2013. In general, it is clearly apparent that in the periods given most inhabitants in the USA went to fast food eateries once a week or once or twice a month.
Looking in more detail from the chart, people who consume fast food at restaurants once a week in 2003 were reported at around 30% and rose slightly at 33% in 2006. However its percentage decreased by 6% in the next decade. Similarly, those who went to the restaurants once or twice a month were documented at 30% and increased at 33% in 2013. However, its figures dropped considerably at 25% in 2006. Following the two types of rate above, American fast food consumption at several times a week fluctuated between near 16% to 20%. Furthermore, the visitors who spent their few times a year for eating at the fast food eateries were also reported from 13% to 15% in the periods. In contrast, those who never going to the restaurants or daily eaters showed similar percentage at not more that 5% in the three cut off points of the periods.
- People who travel to another country to live work or study for a period of time often suffer badly from homesickness Why is this What are the best ways to reduce this problem 61
- Many people believe that it is a good idea to have a dress code at work place Do you agree or disagree with statement 67
- Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn t be encouraged among students Do you agree or disagree with this idea 73
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 87
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d 30% and rose slightly at 33% in 2006. However its percentage decreased by 6% in the n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58962264151 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66700549274 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.031713829 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237802092349 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953466073883 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819190450624 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217202532759 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551251607227 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d 30% and rose slightly at 33% in 2006. However its percentage decreased by 6% in the n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58962264151 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66700549274 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.031713829 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237802092349 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953466073883 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819190450624 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217202532759 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551251607227 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.