The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000.
The pie chart illustrates the distribution of budget that was spent by UAE government on various categories in the year 2000. Data was given in AED dollar.
It is clear that AED government spent over 300 billion on the key sectors. Moreover, a significant percentage of expenditure was spent for social security and social services.
As seen from the data, it is evident that largest amount of government budget was used on social security, with staggering 100 billion spent. This was twofold higher than that of health and personal social services, which constituted 53 billion dollars. Noteworthy is the fact that these two sectors already represented 50% of the government budget in 2000.
Evidently, another half of expenditure was distributed on many diverse sectors. While Education comprised 38 billions, with a mere 9 million, Transportation saw negligible support from the government. In addition, expenditure for Defense and Debt interest were practically identical. Lastly, the rest of sectors and others spent some 20 billion and 23 billion respectively.
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 84
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back Things to include Facts You need to be concise but explain what happened Polite N 16
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past, what are the reasons for this? What do you think can be done for it? 89
- Some people think that the governmnet is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45508982036 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01193438145 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9799018415 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8181818182 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200990958438 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776629375842 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954674976242 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13479897296 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732191521225 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.