The bar chart compares the amount of of an average house in five different cities namely New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London between 1990 and 2002 from the average in 1989.
Tokyo and London show a fall of 7 percentage in the first six years since 1990 from the average prices of house in 1989. Similarly, New York also followed a declining nature at 5 percentage. In spite of that, Madrid and Germany e increase the amount to around 2 percentage and 3 percentage respectively than the average in 1989.
Next 7 years from 1996 to 2002, almost all the cities mod in an upward trend in the cost of house. A dramatic rice in the price of the house was shown by the UK at around 12 percentage then from 1989. The other three cities namely New York, pain and Germany short and elevation at 5 percentage, around 4 percentage and to percentage respectively. In contrast, we can see F5 percentage reduction in the price of house in Tokyo in a 7 year period since 1996 when compared with the amount in 1989.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that the first six years started from 1990, majority of the cities declined the cost of price from 1989, whereas next seven years since 1996 showed rise in the price of house by almost all cities.
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from ignorance to knowledge Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures and overvalues our achievements Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 61
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children while others feel it should be purely optional Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso
- The line graph below shows the quality of waste produced by companies between the year 2000 to 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
The bar chart compares the amount of of an average house in five different citi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47368421053 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41172242344 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8785299042 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276794732472 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129071146308 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103196502345 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207076352953 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737478617736 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.